zdmeЗдоровье мегаполисаCity Healthcare2713-2617ГБУ «НИИОЗММ ДЗМ»10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2024.v.5i3;131-140zdme-90Research ArticleОБЗОРЫREVIEWSПрактика формирования стандартных наборов показателей для измерения результатов, важных для пациентаDeveloping Standard Sets of Indicators for Patient-Centered Outcome Measureshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-5333БударинС. С.BudarinS. S.

Бударин Сергей Сергеевич – д-р. экон. наук, ведущий научный сотрудник

115088, г. Москва, ул. Шарикоподшипниковская, д. 9

Sergey S. Budarin – Doctor of Economics, Leading Researcher

9, Sharikopodshipnikovskaya ul., Moscow, 115088

BudarinSS@zdrav.mos.ruНаучно-исследовательский институт организации здравоохранения и медицинского менеджмента Департамента здравоохранения города МосквыResearch Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department20242511202453131140Copyright © Бударин С.С., 20242024Бударин С.С.Budarin S.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.city-healthcare.com/jour/article/view/90

В статье представлена практика формирования стандартных наборов оценочных показателей результатов лечения, важных для пациента, осуществляемая рабочими группами медицинских специалистов под эгидой Международного консорциума по измерению результатов в области здравоохранения (ICHOM). Выявлены основные этапы деятельности рабочих групп, методы и критерии принятия решений о включении того или иного показателя в стандартный набор. Установлено, что стандартные наборы показателей могут применяться медицинскими организациями в разных странах, независимо от действующей модели здравоохранения, что позволяет проводить международные сравнения результатов. Однако результаты изучения научных публикаций говорят о том, что, несмотря на подтверждение валидности и достоверности результатов, получаемых с использованием опросных листов PROM, по некоторым нозологиям рекомендуется доработка и адаптация стандартных наборов показателей к условиям функционирования действующей в стране системы здравоохранения.

The article describes how working groups of medical specialists led by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) develop standard sets of indicators for patient-centered outcome measures. The main stages of working groups’ activity, methods, and criteria for including indicators were defined. The study showed that outcomes are comparable across countries since standard sets of indicators can be used by healthcare organizations all over the world, regardless of the healthcare model. While it is confirmed that the data obtained using PROM questionnaires are valid and reliable, it is recommended, based on the literature review, to fine-tune the standard sets of indicators for some nosologies to the features of the local healthcare system.

стандартный набор оценочных показателейCROMPROMопросные формыICHOMрабочие группыstandard set of evaluation indicatorsCROMPROMsurvey formsICHOMworking groupsReferencesG. Keel, C. Savage, M. Rafiq, P. Mazzocato, Time-driven activity-based costing in health care: A systematic review of the literature, Health Policy, Volume 121, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 755-763, ISSN 0168-8510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.013G. Keel, C, Savage, M, Rafiq, P, Mazzocato, Time-driven activity-based costing in health care: A systematic review of the literature, Health Policy, Volume 121, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 755-763, ISSN 0168-8510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.013McNamara RL, Spatz ES, Kelley TA, et al. Standardized Outcome Measurement for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 May 19; 4(5):e001767. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001767. PMID: 25991011; PMCID: PMC4599409.McNamara RL, Spatz ES, Kelley TA, et al. Standardized Outcome Measurement for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 May 19; 4(5):e001767. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001767. PMID: 25991011; PMCID: PMC4599409.Nano J, Carinci F, Okunade O, Whittaker S, Walbaum M, Barnard-Kelly K, et al. A standard set of personcentred outcomes for diabetes mellitus: results of an international and unified approach. Diabet Med. 2020; 37(12): 2009 – 18. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14286.Nano J, Carinci F, Okunade O, Whittaker S, Walbaum M, Barnard-Kelly K, et al. A standard set of person-centred outcomes for diabetes mellitus: results of an international and unified approach. Diabet Med. 2020; 37(12): 2009 – 18. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14286.Daniels, K., Rouppe van der Voort, M.B.V., Biesma, D.H. et al. Five years’ experience with value-based quality improvement teams: the key factors to a successful implementation in hospital care. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 1271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08563-5.Daniels, K., Rouppe van der Voort, M.B.V., Biesma, D.H. et al. Five years’ experience with value-based quality improvement teams: the key factors to a successful implementation in hospital care. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 1271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08563-5.Varela-Rodríguez C, García-Casanovas A, Baselga-Penalva B, et al. Healthcare Project Implementation in a Hierarchical Tertiary Hospital: Lessons Learned. Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 3; 9:755166. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755166. PMID: 35186863; PMCID: PMC8850702.Varela-Rodríguez C, García-Casanovas A, Baselga-Penalva B, et al. Healthcare Project Implementation in a Hierarchical Tertiary Hospital: Lessons Learned. Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 3; 9:755166. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755166. PMID: 35186863; PMCID: PMC8850702.Портер М.Э., Ларссон С., Ли Т.Х. Стандартизация оценки результатов лечения пациентов. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11; 374(6):504-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1511701. ПМИД: 26863351.Porter ME, Larsson S, Lee TH. Standardizing Patient Outcomes Measurement. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11; 374(6):504-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1511701. PMID: 26863351.Steinmann, G., van de Bovenkamp, H., de Bont, A. et al. Redefining value: a discourse analysis on valuebased health care. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 862 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05614-7.Steinmann, G., van de Bovenkamp, H., de Bont, A. et al. Redefining value: a discourse analysis on value-based health care. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 862 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05614-7.Фауст-Райт К., Виссиг С., Стоуэлл К. и др. Разработка основного набора показателей результатов лечения ГМП. Int Urogynecol J, 28, 1785–1793 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3481-6.Foust-Wright, C., Wissig, S., Stowell, C. et al. Development of a core set of outcome measures for OAB treatment. Int Urogynecol J 28, 1785–1793 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3481-6Neil E. Martin, Laura Massey, Caleb Stowell, et al. Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer, European Urology, Volume 67, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 460-467, ISSN 0302-2838, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.075.Neil E. Martin, Laura Massey, Caleb Stowell, et al. Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer, European Urology, Volume 67, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 460-467, ISSN 0302-2838, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.075.Philipp, R., Lebherz, L., Thomalla, G., Härter, M., Appelbohm, H., et al. (2021). Psychometric properties of a patient-reported outcome set in acute stroke patients. Brain and Behavior, 11, e2249. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2249.Philipp, R., Lebherz, L., Thomalla, G., Härter, M., Appelbohm, H., et al. (2021). Psychometric properties of a patient-reported outcome set in acute stroke patients. Brain and Behavior, 11, e2249. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2249.David J. Einstein, Dattatraya Patil, Jonathan Chipman, et al. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) Online: Validation of an Internet-Based Instrument for Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life After Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer, Urology, Volume 127, 2019, Pages 53-60, ISSN 0090-4295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.02.004.David J. Einstein, Dattatraya Patil, Jonathan Chipman, et al. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) Online: Validation of an Internet-Based Instrument for Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life After Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer, Urology, Volume 127, 2019, Pages 53-60, ISSN 0090-4295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.02.004.Majken M. Brønserud, Maria Iachina, Anders Green, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in lung cancer: Experiences from a nationwide feasibility study, Lung Cancer, Volume 128, 2019, Pages 67-73, ISSN 0169-5002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.12.014.Majken M. Brønserud, Maria Iachina, Anders Green, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in lung cancer: Experiences from a nationwide feasibility study, Lung Cancer, Volume 128, 2019, Pages 67-73, ISSN 0169- 5002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.12.014.Dronkers EAC, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, van der Poel EF, Sewnaik A, Offerman MPJ. Keys to successful implementation of routine symptom monitoring in head and neck oncology with "Healthcare Monitor" and patients' perspectives of quality of care. Head Neck. 2020 Dec; 42(12):3590-3600. doi: 10.1002/hed.26425. Epub 2020 Aug 18. PMID: 32808370; PMCID: PMC7754276.Dronkers EAC, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, van der Poel EF, Sewnaik A, Offerman MPJ. Keys to successful implementation of routine symptom monitoring in head and neck oncology with "Healthcare Monitor" and patients' perspectives of quality of care. Head Neck. 2020 Dec; 42(12):3590-3600. doi: 10.1002/hed.26425. Epub 2020 Aug 18. PMID: 32808370; PMCID: PMC7754276.Хатьков И.Е., Минаева О.А., Домрачев С.А., Приймак М.А., Соловьев Н.О., Тютюнник П.С. PROM – современный подход к оценке качества жизни пациентов с онкологическими заболеваниями. Терапевтический архив. 2022;94(1):122–128. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2022.01.201343.Khatkov IE, Minaeva OA, Domrachev SA, Priymak MA, Solovyev NO, Tyutyunnik PS. PROM a contemporary approach to assessing the quality of life of patients with cancer. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv (Ter. Arkh.). 2022; 94 (1):122–128. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2022.01.201343

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.