Age pattern of fertility in Moscow and its differences in municipal districts
https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2022.v.3i4;6-13
Abstract
The article analyzes age-specific fertility rates and the average age of mothers at birth in Moscow in comparison with Russia as a whole and St. Petersburg. Special attention is paid to these indicators differentiated by the order of birth (first, second, third), as they do not depend on the birth rate. In Moscow, the average age of mothers at birth is significantly higher than in Russia as a whole, but lower than in Saint Petersburg. Lack of data on the number of population by sex and age in Moscow's municipal districts prevents a correct comparative analysis of the age pattern of fertility for them. But based on the distribution of the numbers of births by maternal age groups, the average age at birth for 2021 is calculated.
About the Authors
V. N. Arkhangelskiy
State Budgetary Institution "Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department";
Institute for Demographic Research – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir N. Arkhangelskiy – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Researcher, Demography Department;
Head of the Department of Fertility and Reproductive Behavior;
Head of the Population Reproduction and Demographic Policy Sector, Research Laboratory of Population Economics and Demography
9 Sharikopodshipnikovskaya st., 115088, Moscow;
6/1 Fotievoi st., 119333, Moscow;
1, bld. 46 Leninskie Gory, 119991, Moscow
E. S. Zayko
State Budgetary Institution "Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Zayko – analyst
9 Sharikopodshipnikovskaya st., 115088, Moscow
References
1. Zemlyanova E.V., Chumarina V.J. Postponement of childbearing by Russian women in modern socio-economic conditions. Social aspects of population health [online edition] 2018; 64(6). URL: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/1031/30/lang,ru/. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2018-64-6-9
2. Artyukhov I.P., Kapitonov V.F., Shurova O.A., Pavlov A.V. Birth planning, family formation rates and reproductive health of pregnant women. Social aspects of population health. [Electronic scientific journal] 2017; 58(6). URL: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/935/30/lang,ru/ DOI: 10.21045/2071-5021-2017-58-6-7
3. Correa-de-Araujo R., Yoon S. Clinical Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies Due to Advanced Maternal Age. Journal of Women’s Health. Vol. 30, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8860
4. Beaujouin É., Reimondos A., Gray E., Evans A., Sobotka T. Declining realization of reproductive intentions with age. Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2019. 34(10), 1906–1914. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez150
5. Karpova V.M. Reproductive history as a factor in reproductive behaviour. Vestnik (Herald) of Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and political science. 2018;24(3):62-86. https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-3-62-86
6. Ediev D.M. On the role of average maternal age at childbirth in long-term demographic dynamics // Voprosy statistiki. – 2006. – № 11. – С. 23-31
7. Sobotka T. Ultra-low fertility in South Korea: The role of the tempo effect. Demographic Research. 2018. 38, 549–576. DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.22
8. Arkhangelsky V.N., Kalachikova O.N. Maternal age at first birth: dynamics, regional differences, determination // Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. – 2020. – Т. 13. № 5. – С. 200-217. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.12
Review
For citations:
Arkhangelskiy V.N., Zayko E.S. Age pattern of fertility in Moscow and its differences in municipal districts. City Healthcare. 2022;3(4):6-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2022.v.3i4;6-13
Views:
113
Email this article 