The possibilities of using foreign experience in the support of polymorbid patients in Russian Healthcare
https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2022.v.3i4;54-65
Abstract
The relevance of the study is related to the positive trend of polymorbidity, which has shown positive dynamics over the past decades and continues to grow. Polymorbidity reduces the quality of life of patients, increases the risk of functional limitations and complicates effective treatment. In some subgroups of polymorbid patients, high rates of re-hospitalization and provision of expensive medical services are observed. It should be noted that the organization of support and improvement of the effective provision of outpatient care to patients with two or more chronic diseases makes it possible to achieve positive results in treatment. In some foreign countries, there is a positive experience in providing a whole range of medical services to polymorbid patients, as well as an integrated approach to the organization of effective medical support. Such an experience with the condition of Russian adaptation can be implemented in our country.
The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the application of various approaches to the organization of maintenance of polymorbid patients on the example of several countries. Based on the analysis of the activities of various centers and organizations that are engaged in the support of polymorbid patients, author's proposals for the possible organization of a Center for medical and social assistance to these patients are made. When forming the functional structure of the Center, clear coordination between various health services, social protection organizations and rehabilitation of patients with two or more chronic diseases is necessary. More attention in Russia should be paid to the development of health promotion and disease prevention programs.
The proposed measures will allow to obtain a positive synergetic effect and fulfill strategic objectives: to increase life expectancy, reduce mortality, increase the active working life of the population.
About the Authors
E. I. Medvedeva
State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department”;
Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yelena I. Medvedeva – PhD, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Behavioral Economics;
Research Fellow
9, Sharikopodshipnikovskaya st., 115088 Moscow;
32, Nakhimovsky Ave., 117218, Moscow
S. V. Kroshilin
State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department”;
Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
Ryazan State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Kroshilin – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Mathematics, Physics and Medical Informatics;
Senior Researcher;
Researcher
9, Sharikopodshipnikovskaya st., 115088 Moscow;
32, Nakhimovsky Ave., 117218, Moscow;
9, Vysokovoltnaya st., 390026, Ryazan
References
1. Rimashevskaja N.M., Dobrohleb V.G., Medvedeva E.I., Kroshilin S.V. Demograficheskij perehod – specifika rossijskoj modeli. Narodonaselenie. 2012; 1(55): 23-32. (in Russian).
2. Kondrakova Je.V. Prichiny smerti pozhilyh kak otrazhenie social'nogo neblagopoluchija. Profilaktika zabolevanij i ukreplenie zdorov'ja. 2007; 5: 26-27. (in Russian).
3. Starodubov V.I., Medik V.A. Zabolevaemost' naselenija // Obshhestvennoe zdorov'e i zdravoohranenie. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo. Moscow: GJeOTAR-Media; 2013: 45-58. (in Russian).
4. Kobjakova O. S., Kulikov E. S., Malyh R. D., Chernogorjuk G. Je., Deev I. A., Starovojtova E. A., Kirillova N. A., Zagromova T. A., Balaganskaja M. A. Strategii profilaktiki hronicheskih neinfekcionnyh zabolevanij: sovremennyj vzgljad na problemu. Kardiovaskuljarnaja terapija i profilaktika. 2019; 18(4): 92–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.15829/1728880020194-9298. (in Russian).
5. Rybakovskij L. L., Hasaev G. R. Strategija demograficheskogo razvitija Rossii, ponjatie i soderzhanie. Narodonaselenie. 2015; 3: 59-60. (in Russian).
6. Dobrohleb V. G., Medvedeva E. I., Kroshilin S. V. Novye podhody k modelirovaniju vozrastnoj dinamiki chislennosti detej i molodjozhi. Jekonomicheskij zhurnal. 2014; 3(35): 30-37. (in Russian).
7. Collins C.E., Butler F.R., Gueldner S.H., Palmer M.H. Models for community-based long-term care for the elderly in a changing health system. Nurs. Outlook. 1997; Vol. 45. 2: 59-63.
8. Lafortune G., Baltstat G. Disability study expert group members. Trends in severe disability among elderly people: assessing the evidence in 12 PECD countries and the future implications. Paris: OECD; 2005.
9. Addio A.C., Ercole V.V. Trends and determinants of fertility rates in OECD countries: the role of policies. Paris: OECD; 2005.
10. Grinin V.M., Shestemirova Je.I. Demograficheskoe starenie v Rossii na sovremennom jetape. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii medicinskih nauk. 2015; 3: 348-354. (in Russian).
11. Anderson G., Hussey P. Comparing health system performance in OECD countries. Health Affairs. 2001; 20: 219-232.
12. Black D. The geriatric day hospital. Age and Ageing. 2005; Vol. 34. 5: 427-429.
13. Akner G. Geriatrie medicine in Sweden: a study of the organisation, staffing and care production in 2000-2001. Age Ageing. 2004; Vol. 33. 4: 338-341.
14. Wilson D.M., Truman C.D. Evaluating institutionalization by comparing the use of health services before and after admission to a long-termcare facility. Eval. Health Prof. 2004; Vol. 27. 3: 219-236.
15. Stranberg-Larsen M., Nielsen M., Vallgarda S., Krasnik A., Vrangbaek K., Mossialos E. Denmark: Health system revive. Health system in Transition. 2007; 9(6): 144-164.
16. Burton J.R. The evolution of nursing homes into comprehensive geriatrics centers: a perspective. Geriatr. Soc. 1994; Vol. 42. 7: 794-796.
17. Freedman V.A., Aukan Y., Wolf D.A., Marcotte J.F. Disability and home care dynamics among older unvaried Americans. J. Gerontol. Social Sei. 2004; Vol. 59B. 1: 25-33.
18. Sturdy D. Electronic support for 21st century care. Age and Ageing. 2005; Vol. 34. 5: 421-422.
19. Vlasova I.A., Gubin G.I. Gerontologicheskij centr – uchrezhdenie novogo tipa v organizacii ohrany zdorov'ja ljudej starshego pokolenija. V kn.: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii «Aktual'nye problemy obshhestvennogo zdorov'ja i zdravoohranenija v sovremennyh uslovijah». Moscow; 2003; Vol. 4: 198-199. (in Russian).
20. Gruenberg E. The failures of success. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. 1977; 55: 3-24.
21. Rachel B., Doyle Y., Grandy E., McKee M. What are the possible responses-other measures of the health system in connection with the aging of the population? Analysis of health systems and policies. World Health Organization on behalf of the European: Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2009.
22. Aleksandrova O.A., Jarasheva A.V., Nenahova Ju.S. Podgotovka sestrinskogo korpusa dlja stolichnyh medicinskih organizacij: problemy i reshenija. Problemy social'noj gigieny, zdravoohranenija i istorii mediciny. 2020; Т. 28. S: 680-686. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2020-28-s1-680-686. (in Russian).
23. Aleksandrova O.A., Jarasheva A.V., Alikperova N.V., Vinogradova K.V., Aksenova E.I. Sposoby povyshenija trudovoj motivacii rabotnikov medicinskih organizacij. Problemy social'noj gigieny, zdravoohranenija i istorii mediciny. 2020; Т. 28. S2: 1049-1055. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2020-28-s2-1049-1055. (in Russian).
24. McKinsey. Understanding patients’ needs and risk: a key to a better NHS: Health Systems and Services Practice. Designed by VME London Copyright; 2013.
25. Busse R., Riesberg A. Health care systems in transition: Germany: Copengagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2004.
26. Sandier S., Paris V., Poltron D. Health care systems in transition: France. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2004.
27. Payane K.A., Wilson C.M., Caro J.J., O’Brien J.A. Resource use by dementia patients and caregivers: an international survey of medical and special services and processes of long-term care: Annals of long-term care, 1999; 7: 263-276.
Review
For citations:
Medvedeva E.I., Kroshilin S.V. The possibilities of using foreign experience in the support of polymorbid patients in Russian Healthcare. City Healthcare. 2022;3(4):54-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2022.v.3i4;54-65
Views:
58
Email this article 