Education Attainment of the Working-Age Population of Moscow According to the Population Census
https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2024.v.5i4p2;346-362
Abstract
Background. As a separate constituent entity of the Russian Federation, Moscow is characterized by significant heterogeneity of the population and its determinants of health, largely due to socioeconomic factors, the most important of which is the educational status of the population. Considering that the main contribution to the trends in life expectancy is made by the workingage population, the purpose of the study is to analyze the difference in the level of education of certain age groups in the districts and municipalities of Moscow. The data was obtained from the Population Census 2021. The highest educational qualification is observed in the Central and Western parts of Moscow, including the recently incorporated Novomoskovskiy Administrative Okrug (administrative district), while the residents of the Southern, Zelenogradskiy, and Troitskiy Administrative Okrugs have the lowest educational qualification. At the same time, there is a mixed education trend: on the one hand, the centripetal force in educational qualification is prevalent (the closer the center, the higher the educational qualification); on the other hand, dispersed settlement is being formed. As a result, the highest qualification levels are observed in remote areas of the capital, while the lowest are shifting to the center. From a social point of view, special attention should be paid to territories with the maximum share of both highly and poorly educated populations, especially considering the similar situation in the Central Administrative Okrug.
About the Authors
V. G. SemenovaRussian Federation
Victoria G. Semyonova – ScD in Economics, Researcher of Demography Division; Chief Researcher
9, Sharikopodshipnikovskaya ul., 115088, Moscow, Russian Federation;
6, bldg. 1, Fotieva ul., 119333, Moscow, Russian Federation
A. E. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Alla E. Ivanova –ScD in Economics, Professor, Head of Demography Division; Head of the Department of Health and Self-Preservation Behavior
9, Sharikopodshipnikovskaya ul., 115088, Moscow, Russian Federation;
6, bldg. 1, Fotieva ul., 119333, Moscow, Russian Federation
References
1. Arkhangelskiy V.N., Donets E.V., Elizarov V.V., et al. Demograficheskoe razvitie Moskvy: tendentsii, problemy, perspektivy [Demographic development of Moscow: trends, problems, prospects]. Moscow: OOO “Variant”, 2015. 156 p. – ISBN 978-5-00080-037-9. (In Russ.)
2. Makhrova A.G., Chukanova O.A. Naselenie Moskvy: analiz vnutrigorodskikh razlichiy [Moscow Population: Analysis of Intra-City Differences]. In: Geografiya na rubezhe vekov: problemy regional’nogo razvitiya: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (22-25 Sep 1999, Kursk). Kursk: Kurskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet, 1999. V. 2. P. 148-152. (In Russ.)
3. Vendina O.I., Panin A.N., Tikunov V.S. Social space of Moscow: peculiarities and patterns. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya. 2019; (6): 3-17. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S2587-5566201963-17
4. Makhrova A.G., Nozdrina N.N. Differentiation of the housing market in Moscow as a manifestation of the social stratification of population. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2002; (3): 44-50. (In Russ.)
5. Kuzmin G.V. Interurban social differentiation in Moscow. In: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: teoriya, metodologiya i praktika prepodavaniya: Materialy vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii “Vtorye Maksakovskie chteniya” (12 Apr 2017, Moscow). Zayats D.V., ed. Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University, 2017. P. 418-431. (In Russ.)
6. Simagin Yu.A., Grishanov V.I. Tendentsii razvitiya Moskovskoy aglomeratsii posle sozdaniya “Novoy Moskvy” [Development trends of the Moscow agglomeration after the creation of “New Moscow”]. In: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie problemy gorodov i regionov Rossii i mira: sbornik materialov konferentsii (26 May 2016, Moscow). Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), 2017. P. 238-252. (In Russ.)
7. Gutik T.V. Social effect of municipal authorities’ activities to maintain and promote public health (a case of the city of Khabarovsk) [1]. Theory and practice of social development. 2020; 144(2): 18-22. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2020.2.2.
8. Novoselova E.N. Main factors of megalopolis citizens’ life expectancy (example of Moscow). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2016; 22(2): 176-200. (In Russ.)
9. Ivanova A.E., Zemlyanova E.V., Mikhaylov A.Yu., Golovenkin S.E. The differences in mortality of adult population of Russia according level of education. Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Health Care of the Russian Federation, Russian journal). 2024; 58(2): 4-8. (In Russ.)
10. Yudina T.N., Bormotova T.M. Migration and crime in Moscow: reality and representation. Science. Culture. Society. 2018; (4): 47-58. (In Russ.)
11. Semenova V.G., Ryazantsev S.V., Ivanova A.E., et al. Population loss in metropolis in the context of migration (exemplified by Moscow). Social aspects of population health [serial online]. 2016; 51(5): 5. Available from: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/776/30/lang,ru/. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21045/2071-5021-2016-51-5-5.
12. Tiunkov A.V. Research and comparative assessment of external and internal factors of migration processes in Moscow. Innovatsii i investitsii. 2019; (3): 126-129. (In Russ.)
13. Makhrova A.G., Golubchikov O.Yu. Russian town under capitalism: social transformation of intraurban space. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2012; (2): 26-31. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Semenova V.G., Ivanova A.E. Education Attainment of the Working-Age Population of Moscow According to the Population Census. City Healthcare. 2024;5(4):346-362. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2024.v.5i4p2;346-362