Socio-Demographic Indicators of Municipalities in International Practice: a Review of Approaches to Clustering and Assessing Population Health
https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2024.v.5i4p2;378-388
Abstract
Introduction. The socio-demographic status of residents is a significant factor for differentiating territories by the public health level at the national, regional, and municipal levels. To develop and implement measures aimed at improving population health, it is advisable to consider the social and demographic structure of municipalities. This should be followed by typological classification and clustering according to the level of development and demographic potential as part of the execution of the state assignment of Moscow Healthcare Department (Reg. No. NIOKTR 123032100064-0).
Purpose. To conduct a review of socio-demographic indicators used in international practice for further formation of a socio-demographic profile of districts and municipalities of Moscow based on Census data.
Materials and methods. Content analysis was conducted on international and Russian scientific publications accessible through international databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, eLibrary, and CyberLeninka. The units of analysis were the queries “socio-demographic indicators” and “municipal” with “public health” as an adjustment.
Results. The most frequently used indicators were identified. In almost all the studies, income level and education were mentioned; employment status (including the unemployment rate) was studied slightly less frequently; age distribution of the population was ranked 4th, followed by social class and social cohesion; living conditions and behavioral factors were presented only in 2 of 13 studies.
Conclusions. Based on a review of international experience and Russian research, it seems appropriate to use the following indicators to form a socio-demographic profile of administrative districts and municipalities of Moscow based on Census data: population size, age, and sex composition (especially the ratio of children to the elderly), components of natural population change (birth rate, mortality), education, income and source of livelihood, employment status, living conditions, and other indicators.
About the Author
S. I. FeiginovaRussian Federation
Svetlana I. Feiginova – Researcher, Demography Division
9, Sharikopodshipnikovskaya ul., 115088, Moscow, Russian Federation
References
1. Ob otdel’nykh pokazatelyakh sotsial’no-demograficheskoi differentsiatsii naseleniya [On individual indicators of socio-demographic differentiation of the population] [Online]. Amurstat. Available at: https://28.rosstat.gov.ru/news/document/207627 (cited 2024 Oct 1). (in Russian)
2. Pritula O.D., Fetisova G.V., Davydova S.G. Determinants of the demographic situation in the region as a basis for typologization of municipalities of the Novgorod region. Central Russian journal of social sciences. 2019; 14(6): 213-229. (in Russian)
3. Ichihara MY, Ferreira AJF, Teixeira CSS, Alves FJO, Rocha AS, Diógenes VHD, et al. Mortality inequalities measured by socioeconomic indicators in Brazil: a scoping review. Rev Saude Publica. 2022; 56: 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004178.
4. Ângela, Freitas., Teresa, Rodrigues., Paula, Santana. Assessing Urban Health Inequities through a Multidimensional and Participatory Framework: Evidence from the EURO-HEALTHY Project. J Urban Health. 2020; (97): 857-875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00471-5.
5. Santos D.C., Endlich A.M. Análise de municípios de pequeno porte econômico epopulacional através dos indicadores sociais. Geoingá: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia (PGE/UEM). 2020; 12(1): 155-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/geoinga.v12i1.51356. (in Portuguese)
6. Worrawat Engchuan., Alexandros C. Dimopoulos., Stefanos Tyrovolas., et al. Sociodemographic Indicators of Health Status Using a Machine Learning Approach and Data from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA). Medical Science Monitor. 2019; 25: 1994-2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.913283.
7. Sarti S., Biolcati-Rinaldi F., Vitalini A. The role of individual characteristics and municipalities in social inequalities in perceived health (Italy, 2010–2012): a multilevel study. J Public Health (Berl.). 2019; 27: 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-0933-5.
8. Makenzius M., Skoog-Garas E., Lindqvist N., Forslund M., Tegnell A. Health disparities based on neighbourhood and social conditions: Open Comparisonsdan indicator-based comparative study in Sweden. Public Health. 2019; 174: 94-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.06.003.
9. Roberto Lillin, Marina Vercelli. The local Socio-Economic Health Deprivation Index: methods and results. J Prev Med Hyg. 2018; 59(4s2): E3-E10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2018.59.4s2.1170.
10. Arpana Verma, Erik van Ameijden, Christopher A. Birt, Ioan Bocsan, Daniel Pope, on behalf of the EURO-URHIS 1 and 2 consortia. Why investigate urban health indicators? European Journal of Public Health. 2017; 27(2): 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv101.
11. Helen Pineo, Ketevan Glonti, Harry Rutter, Nici Zimmermann, Paul Wilkinson, Michael Davie. Census, characteristics, and taxonomy of urban health indicator tools: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2017; 390(3): S70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33005-2.
12. Guanais F.C. Municipal-level covariates of health status in Brazil: a proposed method for data interpolation. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013; 34(3): 190-197. Available at: https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpsp/2013.v34n3/190-197 (cited 2024 Oct 17).
13. Castillo-Salgado, C., Gibbons, M.C. Developing New Urban Health Metrics to Reduce the Know-Do Gap in Public Health. In: Gibbons, M., Bali, R., Wickramasinghe, N., eds. Perspectives of Knowledge Management in Urban Health. Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age. 2010. Vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5644-6_11.
14. Luciana Tricai Cavalini, Antonio Carlos Monteiro Ponce de Leon, Morbidity and mortality in Brazilian municipalities: a multilevel study of the association between socioeconomic and healthcare indicators. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2008; 37(4): 775-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn088.
15. Strohmeier K.P., Schultz A., Bardehle D., Annuß R., Lenz A. Sozialräumliche Clusteranalyse der Kreise und kreisfreien Städte und Gesundheitsindikatoren in NRW. Gesundheitswesen. 2007; 69(1): 26-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-960491. (in German)
16. Ogurtsov A.N., Dmitriev V.V. Integrated assessment of social determinants of public health of the population of the Kaliningrad Region (municipal level). InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020. V. 26. Part 3. P. 78-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2020-3-26-78-90. (in Russian)
17. All-Russian Census of Population 2021 [Online]. Rosstat. Available at: https://eng.rosstat.gov.ru/folder/76215 (cited 2024 Oct 17).
18. Yashina M.L., Aleksandrova N.R. An assessment of the demographic potential of municipalities. International Research Journal. 2021; 107(5): 86-91. (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2021.107.5.080.
19. Dushkova, D.O., Tikunov, V.S., Chereshnya, O.Y. Methodology for Assessment of Public Health at the Municipalities Level (A Case Study of Arkhangelsk Oblast). Geogr. Nat. Resour. 2019; 40(1): 74-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372819010104.
20. Fetisova G.V., Davydova S.G., Pritula O. D. Clustering Of Municipalities By Type Of Demographic Environment. In I. O. Petrovna, eds. In: Project Management in the Regions of Russia, vol 77. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Future Academy, 2019. P. 138-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.05.17.
21. Byurayeva Yu.G. Assessment of the human potential at the municipal level (the case of the Republic of Buryatia). PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin. 2022; (4): 10-21. (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9354/2022.4.1.
22. Stovba E.V., Ivanov S.E., Gabdulkhakov R.B., Stovba A.V., Nizamov S.S., Meshkova N.G. Strategic priorities for formation and Development of Human Capital in the system of municipal governance. Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. 2024; (9-1): 129-136. (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.3710.
23. Huerta Yero E.J., Sacco N.C., Nicoletti M.D.C. Effect of the Municipal Human Development Index on the results of the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections. Expert Systems with Applications. 2021; 168: 114305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114305.
Review
For citations:
Feiginova S.I. Socio-Demographic Indicators of Municipalities in International Practice: a Review of Approaches to Clustering and Assessing Population Health. City Healthcare. 2024;5(4):378-388. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2024.v.5i4p2;378-388