Preview

City Healthcare

Advanced search

Effective Methods of Psychological Treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2026.v.7i2;47-58

Abstract

The aim of this study is to summarize current evidence‑based approaches to psychological treatment for post‑traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and to present a reproducible comparative efficacy assessment of trauma‑focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF‑CBT; protocols include prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, cognitive therapy for PTSD, etc.) and EMDR compared to supportive counseling (treatment as usual, TAU) in a controlled trial with a moderate sample size. Materials and methods. A review of clinical guidelines and meta‑analytic data was conducted, including WHO, NICE, VA/DoD, and APA guidelines, as well as systematic reviews of the effectiveness of TF‑CBT and EMDR and real‑world data. A prospective study (N=180; 60 participants in each group) was conducted with three measurement points: before treatment (T0), after 12 weeks (T1), and after 3 months (T2). The dataset was formed using distributions of baseline indicators and change parameters consistent with published effects of trauma‑focused psychotherapies and service samples, allowing for transparent verification of all calculations and the reproducibility of the patient population. Instruments: PCL‑5 (primary outcome), PHQ‑9, GAD‑7, WHO‑5, and WSAS. Results. A significant group × time interaction was found for the PCL‑5 (LRT χ²(4)=20.68; p=0.0004). Changes from T0 to T1 differed between groups (F(2,177)=13.02; p=0.000005; η²=0.128). Compared with TAU, both trauma‑focused programs produced greater reductions in PTSD symptoms: TF‑CBT vs. TAU d=0.86 (p=0.000007), EMDR vs. TAU d=0.74 (p=0.000097); no differences were found between TF‑CBT and EMDR (p=0.564). The remission rates (PCL-5<33) at T1 were 43.3% (TF‑CBT), 46.7% (EMDR), and 21.7% (TAU); The number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve additional remission relative to TAU was 4.6 (TF‑CBT) and 4.0 (EMDR). Conclusions. Trauma‑focused psychotherapies remain the first‑line treatment for PTSD and demonstrate consistent superiority over non-specific support. A stepwise approach is feasible: standardized assessment and monitoring (PCL‑5), selection of TF‑CBT/EMDR as the primary therapy, reinforcement with skills and digital modules when access is limited, and targeted work with sleep and comorbidity, strictly following the indications.

About the Authors

D. A. Usik
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Dmitrii A. Usik – Assistant of the Department of Family and Childhood Psychology, L.S. Vygotsky Institute of Psychology, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Russian State University for the Humanities.

6, Miusskaya square, Moscow, 115000



V. V. Kaminskii
Psychiatric Clinical Hospital №13
Russian Federation

Vadim V. Kaminskii – Psychiatrist, Department of Psychiatric Care for Psychotic Spectrum Disorders in a Day Hospital, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution «Psychiatric Clinical Hospital №13 of the Department of Health of Moscow».

27 Stavropolskaya St. Moscow, 109559



References

1. Vasileva A.V., Karavaeva T.A., Lukoshkina E.P., Radionov D.S. Basic approaches to the diagnosis and therapy of post‑traumatic stress disorder. V.M. Bekhterev Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology. 2022;56(4):107‑111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31363/2313‑7053‑2022‑4‑107‑111

2. Vasileva A.V., Karavaeva T.A., Radionov D.S. Post‑Traumatic Stress Disorder Psychotherapy ‑ Integrating the Experience of an Emergency. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2023;31(3):47‑68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2023310303

3. Wildgrube S.A., Kramarenko E.V., Firsova G.M. Psychological Features of a Person With PTSD in Conditions of Multicomponent Stress. Journal of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology. (In Russ.) 2023;3(63):67‑74.

4. Kolobova S.V. Rehabilitation after PTSD. Eurasian Union of Scientists. Series: Pedagogical, Psychological and Philosophical Sciences. (In Russ.) 2023;3(104):20‑22. EDN: LRLDAL

5. Padun M.A. Complex PTSD: Psychotherapy of Prolonged Traumatization. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2021:29(3):69‑87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2021290306

6. Ryadinskaya E.N., Volobuev V.V. Organization and methods of providing psychological assistance to combatants with PTSD. Novye Issledovania. 2024;1(77):128‑133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46742/2949‑5377-2024‑77‑1‑128‑133

7. Ulyanina O.A., Gayazova L.A., Faizullina K.A. et al. National and foreign experience in providing emergency psychological assistance to the population. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. 2022;11(3):114‑126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2022110311

8. Kharchenko A.A., Yurieva V.S., Yakupova V.A., Suarez A.D. Psychological and Pharmacological Care for Postpartum Depression and Postpartum PTSD in Russia: Socio‑Economic Factors. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2024;32(2):9‑30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2024320201

9. Bongaerts H., Voorendonk E.M., Van Minnen A. et al. Fully remote intensive trauma‑focused treatment for PTSD and Complex PTSD. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022;13(2):2103287. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2022.2103287

10. Hudays A., Gallagher R., Hazazi A., Arishi A., Bahari G. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing versus Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Treating Post‑Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24):16836. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416836

11. Lang A.J., Hamblen J.L., Holtzheimer P. et al. A clinician's guide to the 2023 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2024;37:19‑34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23013

12. Lundin J., Jansson‑Fröjmark M., Gustafsson‑Björverud L. et al. Integrating digital and in‑person therapy for PTSD: feasibility and acceptability of blended trauma‑focused cognitive therapy in routine care. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2024;15:1447651. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1447651

13. Matthijssen S.J.M.A., Menses S.D.F. Case report: Intensive online trauma treatment combining prolonged exposure and EMDR 2.0 in a patient with severe and chronic PTSD. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2024;15:1370358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1370358

14. Moreno‑Alcázar A., Treen D., Valiente‑Gómez A. et al. Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Children and Adolescent with Post‑traumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta‑Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:1750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01750

15. Peterson A.L., Mintz J., Moring J.C. et al. In‑office, in‑home, and telehealth cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in veterans: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888‑022‑03699‑4

16. Purnell L., Graham A., Chiu K. et al. A systematic review and meta‑analysis of PTSD symptoms at mid‑treatment during trauma‑focused treatment for PTSD. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2024;107(6):102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102925

17. Tng G.Y.Q., Koh J., Soh X.C. et al. Efficacy of digital mental health interventions for PTSD symptoms: A systematic review of meta‑analyses. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024;357;23‑36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.074

18. Watkins L.E., Sprang K.R., Rothbaum B.O. Treating PTSD: A Review of Evidence‑Based Psychotherapy Interventions. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00258

19. Yunitri N., Chu H., Kang X.L. et al. Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: a network meta‑analysis of randomised controlled trials. Psychological Medicine. 2023;53(13):6376‑6388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722003737


Review

For citations:


Usik D.A., Kaminskii V.V. Effective Methods of Psychological Treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. City Healthcare. 2026;7(2):47-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2026.v.7i2;47-58

Views: 19

JATS XML

ISSN 2713-2617 (Online)